· 1/29/1986
State v. Hazlitt
Citations
- 713 P.2d 617
- 77 Or. App. 344
- 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- authorizing inclusion of a reward amount in restitution order if the amount was found to have been paid as a result of the defendant’s criminal conduct
- authorizing inclusion of a reward amount in restitution order if the amount was found to have been paid as a result of the defendant's criminal conduct
- remanding restitution award where it was undisputed that the defendant was convicted of theft based on the sale of a diamond, and where the record failed to establish that a portion of the restitution award was causally linked to the loss of the diamond
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.