Skip to main content
· 1/29/1986

State v. Hazlitt

Citations

  • 713 P.2d 617
  • 77 Or. App. 344
  • 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • authorizing inclusion of a reward amount in restitution order if the amount was found to have been paid as a result of the defendant’s criminal conduct
  • authorizing inclusion of a reward amount in restitution order if the amount was found to have been paid as a result of the defendant's criminal conduct
  • remanding restitution award where it was undisputed that the defendant was convicted of theft based on the sale of a diamond, and where the record failed to establish that a portion of the restitution award was causally linked to the loss of the diamond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.