State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defen- dant was seized where the officer retained her ID for an unspecified period of time, told her that he suspected drug activity, and asked why she was there and if she was a drug user
• considering, among circumstances that constituted a “stop,” fact that officer told defendant that he suspected that drug activity was occurring on the premises and asked her if she was a drug user, while retaining her identification
• stop was unlawful when police officer told the defendant that he suspected that drug activity was occurring on the premises and asked her if she was a drug user, while retaining her identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Soto-Navarro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-10· cited 14×
• State v. Newton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-14· cited 12×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 8×
• State v. McKibben
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-02· cited 2×
• State v. Thier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-11-16· cited 2×
• State v. Layton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
• State v. Backstrand
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 103×
• State v. Painter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 71×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
• State v. Anderson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 43×
• State v. Highley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 30×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-19· cited 2×