State v. Thompson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3206
Syllabus
CRIMINAL – Trial court does not abuse its discretion when discrediting affidavit filed in support of a postconviction petition where trial court tried the criminal case, the affiant is an immediate family member, and the averments in the affidavit directly contradict photographic evidence in the record. Appellant did not establish substantive grounds for relief based on ineffective assistance where he failed to establish defense counsel's investigation of evidence, and could not demonstrate prejudice due to other evidence in the record at odds with his testimony at trial. Appellant did not establish substantive grounds for relief based on ineffective assistance where he failed to establish defense counsel's investigation of his mental health records, which were not offered at trial. A postconviction petitioner has no right to discovery and Appellant failed to argue any extraordinary circumstance establishing that injustice resulted from the trial court's denial of his motion for discovery.
Judges: Dickey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 797×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 645×
- State v. BunchOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-29· cited 64×
- State ex rel. Love v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court· 1999-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-22· cited 4×
- State v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.