Skip to main content

State v. Thompkins

Citations

  • 1996 Ohio 264
  • 75 Ohio St. 3d 558

Syllabus

Criminal law—Drug offenses—R.C. 2925.03(M), 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.23(H) do not violate the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Legislative] goals include the desire to keep the highways clear of people who have demonstrated a willingness to abandon their physical and mental acuity to drugs, the desire to inhibit the ability to buy, sell, transport or use controlled substances . . .”
  • procedural and substantive due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.