State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the defendant’s conviction dates of prior felonies in determining that the defendant’s sentence was properly enhanced
• a sentencing enhancement based on a historical prior felony conviction requires only the conviction, not the commission, to take place before the offense set for sentencing
• a sentencing enhancement based on a historical prior felony conviction requires only the conviction, not the commission, to take place before the offense set for sentencing
• language referring to “any” felony conviction imposes “a timing-of-conviction requirement” but “no timing-of-commission requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District Board
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-06-20· cited 7×
• Garcia v. Warfield (In re Garcia)
  D. Arizona· 2017-02-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hayes v. Continental Insurance
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-04-21· cited 294×
• Janson v. Christensen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 196×
• Zamora v. Reinstein
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 175×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 164×
• Bilke v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 144×
• State v. Christian
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-18· cited 81×
• State v. Phillips
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-05-24· cited 46×
• State v. Thompson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 35×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-29· cited 4×