Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/18/2004
State v. Thomas
Citations
- 98 P.3d 1258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining legal distinctions between affirmative defenses of diminished capacity and voluntary intoxication
- \Expert testimony is helpful if it concerns matters beyond the common knowledge of the average layperson.\(citing State v. Farr-Lenzini, 93 Wn. App. 453, 461,970P.2d313 (1999))
- jurors can draw reasonable inferences from testimony about alcohol use
- “Assault in the first degree includes specific intent as an element.”
- trial court properly excluded expert testimony that defendant had experienced an alcoholic blackout leaving her with no recollection of an assault because the blackout is not evidence that she could not form the intent to commit assault in the first degree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schindler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court· 2019-12-05· cited 198×
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court· 2010-03-04· cited 117×
- State Of Washington v. Darrell D. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-07-24· cited 101×
- State v. GrothCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-12· cited 56×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-28· cited 40×
- State v. GinnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-09· cited 38×
- Melvin Amaya v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-10-07· cited 33×
- State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-24· cited 31×
- State Of Washington, V. Ronald MarkovichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-02· cited 30×
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-07· cited 27×
- State Of Washington v. Daren M. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-26· cited 25×
- State v. OtisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-11· cited 22×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2014-05-02· cited 20×
- State of Washington v. Joseph Andrew RichmondCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-05-01· cited 15×
- State v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-26· cited 14×
- State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien CravenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-11-16· cited 14×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-07-13· cited 13×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-11-30· cited 10×
- Carlton v. Vancouver Care, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-16· cited 10×
- In re the Detention of PettisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-04· cited 10×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 174×
- State v. RehakCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-20· cited 111×
- State v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-10· cited 111×
- State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court· 1987-04-02· cited 99×
- State v. WardenWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 83×
- State v. Virginia WardenWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 83×
- State v. Farr-LenziniCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 76×
- State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court· 1983-10-13· cited 68×
- State v. GabryschakCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-26· cited 61×
- State v. FerrickWashington Supreme Court· 1973-02-22· cited 57×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-20· cited 51×
- State v. SmissaertCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-23· cited 38×
- State v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-01· cited 34×
- State v. GuilliotCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-05-18· cited 30×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-02-14· cited 14×
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-08-17· cited 13×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-17· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.