Court of Appeals of Kansas· 8/11/1995

State v. Thomas

Citations

21 Kan. App. 2d 504
900 P.2d 874
1995 Kan. App. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the rule was \developed in the interest of fundamental fairness” and therefore a defendant does not qualify for the exception if that interest would not be \substantially furthered]”
a defendant may not lead a trial court into error and then complain of the court’s action on appeal
defendant’s untimely appeal seeking conversion under sentencing guidelines denied despite agreement defendant not informed of right to appeal; court upholds denial when not justified by fundamental fairness; defendant not eligible for conversion; appeal would raise no addressable issues
defendant bound by counsel’s stipulations to defendant’s ineligibility for sentencing conversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, C.J., Elliott and Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.