State v. Thomas
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1767
Syllabus
Crim.R. 23(A) requires a defendant in a petty offense case to file a written jury demand if he wants a trial by jury; in the absence of such a demand, appellant's constitutional rights were not violated by a bench trial. Appellant's conviction for criminal damaging was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in awarding restitution in the amount sought by the victim; the amount was substantiated by testimony and exhibits, and appellant did not contest the amount in the trial court. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 382×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 207×
- City of Mentor v. GiordanoOhio Supreme Court· 1967-03-15· cited 134×
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-11· cited 108×
- State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court· 2013-07-17· cited 102×
- State v. WinbushOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 55×
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
- State v. SextonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-14· cited 7×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-13· cited 6×
- State v. DeGeneroOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-21· cited 5×
- State v. CarsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.