Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/15/2024
State v. Carson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5407
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in ordering restitution in an amount that exceeded the damages identified in the criminal complaint, because the damages were a direct and proximate result of appellant's criminal damaging offense and the amount did not exceed the amount of actual damages caused by the offense. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 256×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-23· cited 26×
- State v. OlsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-04· cited 15×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-07· cited 13×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-20· cited 12×
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-01· cited 9×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-13· cited 7×
- State v. FolsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-11· cited 4×
- State v. CarrollOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.