State v. Thomas
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1516
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION – OFFICER SAFETY – BRUEN – INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of his vehicle during a traffic stop where officers reasonably searched defendant's car to protect officer safety after he was removed from the vehicle based on a suspected firearm. Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel's failure to file a motion to dismiss firearm charges under New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), where defendant argued it was merely possible, not probable, that such a motion would have changed the outcome of his case.
Judges: Kinsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court· 2022-06-23· cited 2,263×
- United States v. RahimiSupreme Court· 2024-06-21· cited 416×
- State v. AkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-19· cited 8×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-26· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-28· cited 7×
- State v. SloneOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.