State v. Thomas
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1321
Syllabus
Evid.R. 404(B); Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts; Aggravated Funding of Drug Trafficking; R.C. 2925.05(A). Text messages did not constitute evidence of any other crime, wrong, or act and, therefore, fell outside the scope of Evid.R. 404(B), so the trial court did not deny defendant-appellant a fair trial by not barring admission of the text messages based on Evid.R. 404(B). There was insufficient evidence to sustain defendant-appellant's conviction for aggravated funding of drug trafficking and, therefore, that conviction must be vacated.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 823×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
- State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-02· cited 389×
- State v. Hartman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-22· cited 223×
- State v. RoeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 220×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-07· cited 192×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1999-03-31· cited 127×
- State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-31· cited 73×
- State v. LazzeriniOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-11· cited 10×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-03· cited 5×
- State v. HandshoeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-11· cited 4×
- State v. HikecOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.