Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/16/2026
State v. Allen
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 884
Syllabus
Sufficiency; Manifest Weight. Defendant properly convicted of Engaging in a Pattern of Corrupt Activity and Trafficking offenses. Errors during sentencing require new sentencing hearing.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-30· cited 214×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 147×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 70×
- State v. NienbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-22· cited 63×
- State v. ShockeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-29· cited 15×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-17· cited 15×
- State v. AbstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-21· cited 9×
- State v. HooperOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-29· cited 9×
- State v. HarbutOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-04· cited 4×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-14· cited 3×
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.