State v. Thieszen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion in retaining jurisdiction over 15-year-old defendant where there was some evidence that he could have been successfully rehabilitated within remaining time as minor, crime was particularly violent and defendant might require treatment beyond age of majority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Harris
  California Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 411×
• State v. Phinney
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-05-25· cited 35×
• State v. Nevels
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-04-06· cited 34×
• State v. Thieszen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-03-28· cited 30×
• State v. Ice
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-07· cited 11×
• State v. Rhodes
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-09-15· cited 11×
• State v. Phinney
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-08-10· cited 10×
• State v. Belmarez
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-04-10· cited 5×
• People ex rel. A.D.G.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-08-11· cited 5×
• People in Interest of ADG
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-08-11· cited 3×
• State v. Hill
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-05-15
• State v. Tyler P.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-05-11
• State v. Thieszen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ryan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1987-07-24· cited 78×
• State ex rel. C. A. H.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-05-19· cited 60×
• State v. Alexander
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-10-21· cited 43×
• State v. Peters
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-02-17· cited 30×