Skip to main content

State v. Tharp

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 2750

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pro se representation colorable claim postrelease control. The scope of App.R. 26(B) is limited to a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, and a defendant who represents himself on appeal cannot later argue his own ineffectiveness in an application to reopen under App.R. 26(B). Even if appellant's application was not barred by his self-representation, his proposed assignment of error fails on the merits and therefore cannot support a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal as required under App.R. 26(B)(5). The trial court properly notified appellant of the correct term of postrelease control.

Judges: Blackmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.