State v. Tharp
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 2750
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pro se representation colorable claim postrelease control. The scope of App.R. 26(B) is limited to a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, and a defendant who represents himself on appeal cannot later argue his own ineffectiveness in an application to reopen under App.R. 26(B). Even if appellant's application was not barred by his self-representation, his proposed assignment of error fails on the merits and therefore cannot support a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal as required under App.R. 26(B)(5). The trial court properly notified appellant of the correct term of postrelease control.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 313×
- State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 26×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-08· cited 16×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-13· cited 6×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. HurtOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.