State v. Makin
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8569
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel postrelease control fabricated evidence. Appellant's application to reopen direct appeal fails on the merits because appellant failed to demonstrate a genuine issue that he was deprived effective assistance of appellate counsel. Trial court properly notified appellant that he was subject to a mandatory five-year period of postrelease control trial court had no obligation to impose shorter terms for the remaining offenses. Record also did not support appellant's claim that the prosecutor \fabricated\ evidence and therefore appellate counsel properly refrained from raising assignments of error related to this issue.
Judges: Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 313×
- State v. SheppardOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 68×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-08· cited 16×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-13· cited 6×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. MakinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 3×
- State v. TharpOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.