State v. Teter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statute regulating the purchase of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine was not unconstitutionally vague based solely on the language of the statute
• finding statute regulating the purchase of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine was not unconstitutionally vague based solely on the language of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of A.E.S.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 22×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-06-21· cited 4×
• White v. Shipman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2017-04-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McCaslin
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-01-21· cited 177×
• State v. Voyles
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 118×
• State v. Whitesell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 104×
• State v. Laturner
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-10-09· cited 66×
• State v. Richardson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 56×
• Smith v. Martens
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 53×
• City of Wichita v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-03-02· cited 32×
• Pitcock v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-07-31· cited 16×
• People v. Willner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-26· cited 5×