Hawaii Supreme Court· 9/13/1982

State v. Temple

Citations

650 P.2d 1358
65 Haw. 261
1982 Haw. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an illegal seizure fatally taints all subsequent police actions and requires suppression of evidence recovered as a result thereof
recognizing that retaining a stolen firearm was motivated by the single criminal impulse to steal the firearm
recognizing that retaining a stolen firearm was motivated by the single criminal impulse to steal the firearm
holding that theft of a firearm was a continuous offense because the conduct element of the theft statute specifically criminalized the ongoing act of “retaining” stolen property
holding that theft of a firearm was a continuous offense because the conduct element of the theft statute specifically criminalized the ongoing act of “retaining” stolen property
holding that an anonymous phone call reporting defendant for stolen firearm offense was an insufficient basis to stop the defendant and, therefore, the conviction of the defendant and the order denying the motion to suppress were reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Nakamura, Marumoto, Place, Lum, Excused, Ogata, Menor, Temporarily

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.