Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 11/13/1989
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 132 N.H. 314
- 566 A.2d 172
- 1989 N.H. LEXIS 110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a test was admissible despite a 1-hour-15-minute delay between driving and testing
- explaining that an individual can be impaired without proof of a specific blood alcohol content, so long as the State proves “impairment to any degree”
- gathering information necessary for accurate retrograde extrapolation would place “impossible burden upon the State”
- delay between operation of a motor vehicle and testing goes to weight accorded the test by trier of fact
- breath test taken within “reasonable period of time” admissible on per se and impairment theories without retrograde extrapolation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-12· cited 667×
- Poulnot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-01· cited 80×
- State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-07-19· cited 51×
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 47×
- Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2016-06-22· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-04-19· cited 42×
- Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-04-24· cited 40×
- Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-19· cited 31×
- City of Fargo v. StenslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-11-24· cited 29×
- Mireles v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-05-12· cited 25×
- State v. McGowanMontana Supreme Court· 2006-07-19· cited 21×
- People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-22· cited 16×
- Bierner v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-03-26· cited 14×
- State v. LortonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-08-01· cited 12×
- State v. LusiSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-06-08· cited 11×
- Ransford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-05· cited 10×
- Appeal of Mascoma Valley Regional School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-03· cited 10×
- Haas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-27· cited 8×
- State v. Demond-SuraceSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-05-12· cited 8×
- State v. ParmenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-31· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.