State v. Lusi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pointing out that, in criminal cases, “an inference must never ‘undermine the factfinder’s responsibility at trial, based on evidence adduced by the [s]tate, to find the ultimate facts beyond a reasonable doubt’”
• specifically commenting on the validity of the jury instruction in Lussier
• What constitutes a \reasonable period of time\ when a breathalyzer test must be administered in driving under the influence statute is a \question for the trier of fact in light of the facts and circumstances surrounding each case.\
• “With respect to the question of whether a defendant may offer evidence to rebut the inference that a BAC at the time of the testing was as great at the time of actual driving, * * * once the inference is drawn, competent evidence may be offered in rebuttal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).