Skip to main content

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 506 N.W.2d 767
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 221
  • 1993 WL 414631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the cost of an audit would be a proper element of recovery in a civil conversion case
  • concluding that the cost of an audit was properly included in a restitution order
  • discussing that prosecution costs cannot be included in a restitution order because they are not recoverable in a civil suit
  • requiring defendant to pay for an audit when defendant embezzled money from a State university
  • affirming district court’s restitution order that required defendant to repay the cost of an audit
  • “[T]he question is not whether the district court abused its discretion in ordering restitution for the audit cost, but whether the court had the statutory authority to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.