State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A ‘minimum contacts’ analysis is not applicable to establish jurisdiction in criminal prosecutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Starkey
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2007-07-17· cited 37×
• State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-03-25· cited 25×
• Ex Parte Lekavich
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-08-24· cited 23×
• State v. Amoroso
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-04· cited 13×
• Hageseth v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-21· cited 10×
• Ibarra v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-09-16· cited 7×
• Ex Parte Barry Lee Lekavich
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-08-24
• Amended June 22, 2016 State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-03-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Doran
  Supreme Court· 1978-12-18· cited 640×
• State Ex Rel. Curry v. Gray
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-11· cited 362×
• California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 116×
• State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Denson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-06-27· cited 106×
• State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Klevenhagen
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 66×
• Braxton v. Dunn
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-13· cited 53×
• Ex Parte Boetscher
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-26· cited 35×
• State v. Paiz
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-23· cited 17×
• Ex Parte Hagar
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-13· cited 8×