Skip to main content

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2615

Syllabus

Appellant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise competency concerns, because no evidence presented a reasonable question as to whether he was incompetent. Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law, as it was within the statutory range and the court considered R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.