State v. Tate
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3721
Syllabus
Crim.R. 29/motion for acquittal R.C. 2911.12(A)(3)/burglary 2909.05(F)(2)/vandalism sufficiency manifest weight R.C. 2941.25(B)/allied offenses plain error. Although the second-degree charge of burglary against appellant was dismissed, there remained sufficient evidence to find appellant guilty of the lesser-degree charge of burglary there was also sufficient evidence to find appellant guilty of vandalism. Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's acts of burglary and vandalism were separate acts. The trial court did not err where appellant's offenses were not merged as allied offenses.
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. ComenOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 614×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 491×
- State v. MetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-03· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.