State v. Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the case which prompted the adoption of our present criminal discovery rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
• State v. Laws
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-09-25· cited 84×
• State v. Eads
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-04-08· cited 46×
• Doakes v. District Court of Oklahoma County
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1968-11-27· cited 19×
• State v. Green
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-05-23· cited 18×
• State v. Roth
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-12-05· cited 13×
• State v. Kearney
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-03-25· cited 11×
• State v. Tull
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-10· cited 5×
• State v. Falcetano
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-10-10· cited 2×
• State v. Harris
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1962-06-27· cited 156×
• Kardy v. SHOOK, J.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-15· cited 67×
• State v. Mahoney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1961-12-15· cited 22×
• Reed v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1959-06-16· cited 21×
• State v. Lampp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-06-21· cited 20×
• People v. Mersino
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-09-29· cited 12×