Skip to main content

State v. Tanner

Citations

  • 385 S.E.2d 832
  • 299 S.C. 459
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the denial of a motion for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion
  • the trial judge’s grant or denial of a motion for continuance will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
  • the trial judge's grant or denial of a motion for continuance will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
  • denial of a motion for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial judge
  • “A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and its ruling on such motion will not be reversed without a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.