State v. McKennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a trial court's denial of a motion for a continuance \will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion\ (quoting State v. Williams , 321 S.C. 455, 459, 469 S.E.2d 49, 51 (1996))
• finding defendant was not entitled to continuance when he failed to name any witnesses he wished to call, how they would be beneficial to his case, or identify any evidence that could be introduced if he had more time to prepare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).