Skip to main content

State v. Swoboda

Citations

  • 918 P.2d 296
  • 276 Mont. 479
  • 53 State Rptr. 478
  • 1996 Mont. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the sentence in Lenihan was illegal or in excess of statutory mandates because the district court lacked the specific statutory authority to impose the sentence
  • explaining that the sentence in Lenihan was illegal or in excess of statutory mandates because the district court lacked the specific statutory authority to impose the sentence
  • Lenihan exception not applicable to unpreserved objection to facially legal sentence that court failed to consider sentencing alternatives as required by statute
  • Lenihan exception not applicable to unpreserved objection to facially legal sentence that court failed to consider sentencing alternatives as required by statute
  • reaching the same conclusion concerning Swoboda’s allegation
  • reaching the same conclusion concerning Swoboda's allegation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leaphart, Turnage, Hunt, Nelson, Trieweiler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.