Skip to main content

State v. Sweet

Citations

  • 949 A.2d 809
  • 195 N.J. 357
  • 2008 N.J. LEXIS 787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing the admissibility of a Breathalyzer® ampoule testing certificate and a testing instrument inspection certificate, respectively
  • noting testimonial nature of signed and certified New Jersey State Laboratory certificates prepared for use in State prosecution
  • noting testimonial nature of signed and certified New Jersey State Laboratory certificates prepared for use in State prosecution
  • explaining the scope of the business record exception to the hearsay rule set forth in N.J.R.E. 803(c)(6)
  • describing the three conditions a proponent must satisfy in order to admit a document under the business record exception to the hearsay rule
  • noting admissibility of ampoule testing certificates and breath testing instrument inspection certificates because nontestimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabner, Long, Lavecchia, Albin, Wallace, Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.