State v. Swanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The obvious intent of the legislature in enacting the forfeiture legislation was to deter the trafficking in narcotics ...\
• “The obvious intent of the legislature in enacting the forfeiture legislation was to deter the trafficking in narcotics . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Loughran v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 8×
• Matter of One 1965 Ford Econoline Van, Etc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-20· cited 6×
• State v. 1969 Volkswagon Bus, Vin 239199800, 1977 Wyoming License No. 2365J
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-10-13· cited 6×
• Matter of One 1969 Chev. 2-Door, Etc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-27· cited 5×
• Leftridge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-12-29· cited 5×
• State v. Campbell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 3×
• Parker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-20· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• Boyd v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
• One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 867×
• One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 544×
• Van Oster v. Kansas
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-23· cited 182×
• In Re One 1965 Ford Mustang
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-01-15· cited 30×
• In Re One 1962 Volkswagen Sedan, Motor No. 4230506
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 8×
• State v. Lewis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-01-15· cited 4×