Skip to main content

State v. Sutton

Citations

  • 565 P.2d 1278
  • 115 Ariz. 417
  • 1977 Ariz. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • title expressing amendatory act’s purpose as ‘‘prescribing penalty for theft of credit card” did not give adequate notice of act’s additional purpose of creating crime of possession of credit card with intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Cameron, Hays, Holo-Han, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.