State v. Sutherland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “For a statute to be facially unconstitutional, it must be unconstitutional in all circumstances, i.e., there can be no reasonably likely circumstances in which application of the statute would pass constitutional muster.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hirsch/Friend
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 43×
• State v. Christian
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-08-15· cited 28×
• Nay v. Department of Human Services
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-12-15· cited 16×
• State v. Illig-Renn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-30· cited 6×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 6×
• Arnold v. Kotek
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Salerno
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Robertson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
• Priest v. Pearce
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 177×
• Armatta v. Kitzhaber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 119×
• State v. Chakerian
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 50×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 31×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 25×
• Delaney v. Shobe
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-11-12· cited 13×
• Hanson v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-04-12· cited 7×