Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/19/1986
State v. Sumpter
Citations
- 344 S.E.2d 148
- 288 S.C. 574
- 1986 S.C. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where issue on appeal involves the sufficiency of the evidence, it is not error to include all the trial testimony
- no error to include all trial testimony where issue on appeal involves a motion for directed verdict or a question on the sufficiency of the evidence
- “When the issue on appeal involves a motion for directed verdict of a question on the sufficiency of the evidence, it is not improper to include all of the testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lawlor v. SCHEPERSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-12-04· cited 19×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-05-24· cited 7×
- Industrial Equipment Co. v. MontagueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-01-27· cited 4×
- State v. SumpterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.