State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the Supreme Court stated that it “reserves the right to impose sanctions, including an order that the offending lawyer pay the cost of reproducing the irrelevant material”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. Griffin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-25· cited 17×
• Merritt v. Grant
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-20· cited 14×
• Brode v. Brode
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-09· cited 10×
• State v. Sumpter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-19· cited 3×
• Coogler v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-17· cited 3×
• State v. Sumpter
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-10· cited 2×
• Morrisette v. Barnes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-03