Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 4/27/1994

State v. Sumlin

Citations

  • 69 Ohio St. 3d 105
  • 630 N.E.2d 681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after determining that trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to allow statements into evidence under State evidentiary law, “considering] whether fundamental principles of due process required the trial court to admit the statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Syllabus, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.