Ohio Supreme Court· 4/27/1994
State v. Sumlin
Citations
- 1994 Ohio 508
- 69 Ohio St. 3d 105
Syllabus
Evidence—Evid.R. 804—Hearsay exceptions—Decision whether to admit hearsay statement of unavailable declarant pursuant to Evid.R. 804(B)(3) is within discretion of trial court. A decision whether to admit the hearsay statement of an unavailable declarant pursuant to Evid.R. 804(B)(3) is one within the discretion of the trial court.
Judges: Alice Robie Resnick, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- Green v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 672×
- United States v. Roberto Salvador and Oscar SalvadorSecond Circuit· 1987-06-04· cited 46×
- State v. SumlinOhio Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.