Connecticut Appellate Court· 1/6/1964
State v. Sullivan
Citations
- 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 412
- 199 A.2d 709
- 1964 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pre-dating Schmerber and Neville, the court did not explicitly mention the constitutional right against self incrimination
- impermissible for doctor to opine as to reliability of lay witness' opinion regarding defendant's sobriety
- impermissible for doctor to opine as to reliability of lay witness’ opinion regarding defendant’s sobriety
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kosicki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1942-12-28· cited 70×
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-11-29· cited 63×
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-07-12· cited 55×
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-08-11· cited 38×
- Crowder v. Zion Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-01-03· cited 28×
- State v. TryonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-05-08· cited 28×
- State v. PennSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-12-11· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.