Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/27/2023
State v. Stultz
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4754
Syllabus
reopened appeal, ineffective assistance, manifest weight, nunc pro tunc, R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), Evid.R. 403(A), clerical mistake
Judges: Flagg Lanzinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- Oberlin v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court· 2001-03-28· cited 138×
- State v. FryOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-18· cited 32×
- State v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-21· cited 21×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-05· cited 15×
- State v. StraughanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-31· cited 12×
- State v. QuinnOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 4×
- State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 3×
- State v. StultzOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 3×
- State v. CarteOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.