Skip to main content
· 12/27/2023

State v. Stultz

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4754

Syllabus

reopened appeal, ineffective assistance, manifest weight, nunc pro tunc, R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), Evid.R. 403(A), clerical mistake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • oral hearing before investigator chosen from outside employee’s agency division for the apparent purpose of preventing employee “from learning anything he could use in his case”
  • concurring opinion of Judge Skelton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flagg Lanzinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.