State v. Strickland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was possible for defendant to be concurrently in custody and on probation as result of separate convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Outlaw
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-24· cited 10×
• State v. Moore
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-09-14· cited 8×
• Magee v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-01· cited 6×
• Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-03-11· cited 1×
• State v. Kelley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-29
• State v. Strickland
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
• State v. Gethers
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 82×
• State v. Guckian
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-29· cited 47×
• State v. Guckian
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-31· cited 39×
• Asherman v. Meachum
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-28· cited 32×
• State v. Deptula
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-04-05· cited 18×
• State v. Smith
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-05-16· cited 13×
• State v. Varricchio
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-03-24· cited 9×