Arizona Supreme Court· 11/1/1976

State v. Strickland

Citations

556 P.2d 320
113 Ariz. 445
1976 Ariz. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding under similar facts that ten-day time period between crime and identification cast doubt on identification’s reliability
ten days between witness and subsequent identification of defendant does not necessarily render identification unreliable
ten days between witness and subsequent identification of defendant does not necessarily render identification unreliable
ten days too long where witness saw attacker for very brief moment and at a point in time where she had no discernible interest in remembering what perpetra tor looked like
ten days too long where witness saw attacker for very brief moment and at a point in time where she had no discernible interest in remembering what perpetrator looked like
ten days between witness and subsequent identification does not necessarily render identification unreliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.