Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/7/1997
State v. Strand
Citations
- 933 P.2d 713
- 261 Kan. 895
- 1997 Kan. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- When an administrative agency has not interpreted its own regulations, the doctrine of operative construction has no application, and this court’s review is unlimited.
- where a statute contains specific penalty provisions for an offense, the specific provisions within the statute, not the KSGA, apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-12-17· cited 203×
- State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-05-28· cited 145×
- State v. ScherzerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-03-04· cited 52×
- State v. RohrCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-07-22· cited 11×
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-07· cited 6×
- State v. BinkleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.