State v. Stout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• payee’s acceptance of post-dated checks constituted an extension of credit which “purged” the transaction of criminal intent
• payee's acceptance of post-dated checks constituted an extension of credit which \purged\ the transaction of criminal intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. Lewis
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-06-11· cited 25×
• Morrison v. Shanwick International Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-09-11· cited 22×
• State v. Clough
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-23· cited 16×
• State v. Phelps
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-01-22· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Daymus
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1961-12-27· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Kelinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-13· cited 28×
• Seaboard Oil Co. v. Cunningham
  Fifth Circuit· 1931-06-22· cited 23×
• State v. McCormick
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-06-18· cited 20×
• State v. Beard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 15×
• State v. Ellis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1948-02-16· cited 11×
• People v. Burnett
  California Supreme Court· 1952-09-19· cited 10×
• State v. Zent
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-12-19· cited 8×