Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/15/1986
State v. Stone
Citations
- 728 P.2d 674
- 151 Ariz. 455
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that questions regarding sacred garments were proper for identifying the defendant even if “they relate[d] somewhat to the credibility of both the victim and the petitioner”
- finding religious faith evidence admissible to provide context for the witness’s identification of the suspect
- “[I]f such information is probative of something other than veracity, it is not inadmissible simply because it may also involve a religious subject as well.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tern, Contreras, Grant, Ulrich, Arizona, Ariz, Const, Art
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 120×
- State v. VallejoUtah Supreme Court· 2019-07-29· cited 23×
- United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1987-04-24· cited 20×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-19· cited 17×
- Sevits v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-05-24· cited 7×
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-14· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Roberto Rosadillo AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-19
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.