State v. Stonaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 9-1-1 call statements satisfied the requirements of OEC 803(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Yong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-28· cited 15×
• State v. Rumary
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-28· cited 6×
• State v. Hasson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 5×
• State v. Underwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 5×
• Wilson v. Laney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-02· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Carlson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 127×
• State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. Haas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-07-31· cited 40×
• People v. Ojeda
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1987-07-23· cited 7×
• State v. Apperson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-05-20· cited 7×