Skip to main content

State v. Stock

Citations

  • 2011 MT 131
  • 256 P.3d 899
  • 361 Mont. 1
  • 2011 Mont. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that no court has “concluded Crawford overruled Craig.”
  • defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford were not violated when six-year-old child testified via two-way closed-circuit television
  • defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford were not violated when six-year-old child testified via two-way closed-circuit television
  • defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford were not violated when six-year-old child testified via two-way closed-circuit television
  • defendant’s confrontation rights under Crawford were not violated when six-year-old child testified via two-way closed-circuit television
  • \Crawford did not overrule or even address Craig.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia O. Cotter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.