State v. Henriod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Crawford did not abrogate Craig and that the district court erred when it determined that Crawford prevented the child witness from testifying through the use of closed-circuit television
• finding Craig controls when analyzing whether a child may testify via closed-circuit television
• “We disagree with the conclusion of the district court that Crawford abrogated Craig. The Crawford majority opinion not only failed to explicitly overrule Craig, but also failed to even mention it.”
• rejecting the argument that Crawford implicitly abrogated Craig
• rejecting the argument that Crawford implicitly abrogated Cr aig
• rejecting the argument that Crawford implicitly abrogated Craig

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).