State v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that for harm- less error analysis “we consider the importance of the erro- neously admitted evidence to a party’s theory of the case”
• \[W]e have considered the significance of challenged evidence in light of the presence or absence of other 'overwhelming evidence' of a defendant's guilt.\
• evidence seized from a vehicle that linked the defendant to one of his prostitutes was cumulative to copious other evidence that the defendant was her pimp, and therefore the admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was harmless
• evidence seized from a vehicle that linked the defendant to one of his prostitutes was cumulative to copious other evidence that the defendant was her pimp, and therefore the admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was harmless
• erroneously admitted evi- dence that is cumulative is generally harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-04· cited 29×
• State v. Dowty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-09· cited 11×
• State v. Wampler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 7×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06· cited 5×
• State v. Zielinski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-07-20· cited 3×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 1×
• State v. Escobar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-28· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Maiden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
• State v. Blaylock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 18×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 11×
• State v. Villanueva-Villanueva
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-30· cited 7×