State v. Stewart
Syllabus
A jury convicted Terrance Edward Stewart of distribution of heroin and two crimes based on his knowing possession of illegal drugs: trafficking in heroin and what we commonly refer to as \simple possession\ of oxycodone. We hold the trial court's jury instruction regarding the definition of constructive possession and the explanation of an inference of \knowledge and possession\ was erroneous. We reverse the trafficking and simple possession convictions and remand those charges for a new trial. However, because the erroneous jury instruction did not prejudice Stewart on the distribution charge, we affirm the distribution conviction.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-10-12· cited 80×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-02-26· cited 48×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-19· cited 47×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-07· cited 41×
- State v. BultronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-11-24· cited 34×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-08-18· cited 33×
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-08· cited 14×
- Cothran v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-08-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.