State v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that suspect's confusion requires suppression of his refusal to submit, explaining that to allow an intoxicated person to profess an inability to comprehend the implied consent law and thereby escape punishment for avoiding detection would render the law meaningless
• where defendant only makes pretense of submission to test, trial court is authorized to find that defendant refused to submit pursuant to OCGA § 40-5-67.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kurecka v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-29· cited 11×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-09-26· cited 8×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-04· cited 5×
• William Newman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-05-22
• Seung Lee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-09-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-24· cited 24×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-06-24· cited 21×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-04· cited 16×
• Furcal-Peguero v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-21· cited 14×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-29· cited 12×
• Leiske v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-06-03· cited 10×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-10-19· cited 8×
• Chamberlain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-10-17· cited 7×
• Fruhling v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-22· cited 5×
• State v. Brookbank
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-01· cited 1×