Fruhling v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Defendant’s conduct constituted a refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test where, having verbally agreed to take the test, he repeatedly refused to blow into the machine hard enough to produce a valid sample.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).